1. Gearman DJ, Morlacco A, Cheville JC, Rangel LJ, Karnes RJ. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1188-1195.
  2. Ellis EE and Frye TP. Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Ther Adv Urol. 2022;14:1-15.
  3. Guimaraes T, Gil M, Medeiros M, Andrade V, Guerra J, Pinheiro H, Fernandes F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging target fusion biopsy vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy – A comparative study of ISUP score upgrading risk in the final radical prostatectomy specimen. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022; 94(3):278-284.
  4. Mehralivand S, Shih JH, Harmon S, et al. A grading system for the assessment of risk of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI. Radiology. 2019;290(3):709-719.
  5. Brooks MA, Thomas L, Magi-Galluzzi C, et al. GPS assay association with long-term cancer outcomes: twenty-year risk of distant metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality. JCO Precis Oncol. 2021;5:PO.20.00325.